On June 29, 2026, the Supreme Court decided Chatrie v. United States, holding that obtaining cell-phone location data from a third-party technology company is a search under the Fourth Amendment. This ...
Most Americans have a cell phone on them or nearby at all times and are concerned with the legality of cell phone location tracking. The courts have wobbled back and forth on Fourth Amendment rulings ...
The Justices held in Chatrie v. United States that Americans have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their detailed Location History records, meaning police must follow the Constitution’s rules ...
On June 29, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Chatrie v. United States, holding that when law enforcement “accesses historical cell phone” location information from a ...
WASHINGTON — In a ruling applying individual constitutional protections to new technology, the Supreme Court on Monday ruled that sweeping use of cell phone location data requires a warrant. The case ...
Chandra Steele has been writing about tech for the entirety of her journalism career. She loves making tough topics easy to understand. Before joining Android Police, Chandra was senior features ...
The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether dragnet warrants that law enforcement uses to scoop up smartphone users’ location data are unconstitutional. So-called geofence warrants have become ...
Wouldn't it be great if you could track any phone simply by entering its number online? You may be surprised to know that phone network operators can already track phones this way. Less surprisingly, ...
AT&T Wireless now says it can meet the Federal Communications Commission’s E911 automatic location-identification requirements, reversing a position it took when it sought a waiver in April from the ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results